The irrationality paradox (2004)

Authors

Abstract

In the study of judgmental errors, surprisingly little thought is spent on what constitutes good and bad judgment. I call this simultaneous focus on errors and lack of analysis of what constitutes an error, the irrationality paradox. I illustrate the paradox by a dozen apparent fallacies; each can be logically deduced from the environmental structure and air unbiased mind.

Bibliographic entry

Gigerenzer, G. (2004). The irrationality paradox. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 336-338. (Full text)

Miscellaneous

Publication year 2004
Document type: Article
Publication status: Published
External URL: http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/gg/GG_Irrationality_2004.pdf View
Categories: Environment Structure
Keywords: availabilityconfidencefrequencyheuristicsjudgmentsmodelsnormsoverconfidenceperceptionreality

Edit | Publications overview