The (in)visibility of psychodiagnosticians' expertise (2015)
Abstract
This study investigates decision making in mental health care. Specifically, it compares the diagnostic decision outcomes (i.e., the quality of diagnoses) and the diagnostic decision process (i.e., pre‐decisional information acquisition patterns) of novice and experienced clinical psychologists. Participants' eye movements were recorded while they completed diagnostic tasks, classifying mental disorders. In line with previous research, our findings indicate that diagnosticians' performance is not related to their clinical experience. Eye‐tracking data provide corroborative evidence for this result from the process perspective: experience does not predict changes in cue inspection patterns. For future research into expertise in this domain, it is advisable to track individual differences between clinicians rather than study differences on the group level. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)(journal abstract)
Bibliographic entry
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Spaanjaars, N. L., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2015). The (in)visibility of psychodiagnosticians' expertise. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bdm.1925 (Full text)
Miscellaneous
| Publication year | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|
| Document type: | Article | |
| Publication status: | Published | |
| External URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1925 View | |
| Categories: | ||
| Keywords: | clinical psychologydiagnostic decision makingexperienceeye-tracking |